Section 5. Seven-Day Low Flow

Background

The hydrologic regime of rivers and streams in the Puget Sound is characterized by peak flows during the winter as a result of heavy precipitation, or during the spring due to snowmelt runoff. Base flows during the summer are low, consisting mainly of groundwater discharge. Base flows can be affected by climate change, urbanization, or groundwater withdrawals. Summer base flow levels are important ecologically because they can define or limit the availability of habitats. Summer base flow levels are important to water resource managers because low flows often coincide with peak consumption.

Climate change is expected to alter river hydrology in the Puget Sound basin. Observed and predicted increases in winter temperatures could result in more precipitation falling as rain instead of snow, earlier snowmelt timing, earlier streamflow timing, and lower summer flows (Mote et al. 1999, Mote et al. 2003). Several studies have evaluated the impacts of climate change on spring snowpack in the Pacific Northwest, with the conclusion that decreasing spring snowpack may result in lower summer flows. Long-term decline in snowpack in the Pacific Northwest was found to correlate largely with increasing temperatures, but not precipitation (Mote 2003). Follow-on studies with a Variable Infiltration Capacity model were performed to discern long term trends in spring snowpack from temperature and precipitation variability (Hamlet et al. 2005, Mote et al. 2005). Results suggested that long-term downward trends in spring snowpack were associated with widespread warming. Trends in snowpack associated with precipitation were largely controlled by decadal oscillations. Multiple regression analysis indicated that climatic oscillations accounted for approximately 10-60% of the trends in spring snowpack, depending on the time series examined (Mote 2006), leading the authors to conclude that the primary factor driving declining snowpack in the Washington Cascades was rising temperatures. The long-term snowpack trends were unrelated to the variability caused by Pacific oscillations.

Casola et al. (2009) investigated the potential impacts of climate change on snowpack by combining future temperature predictions with the estimated temperature sensitivity of spring snowpack. Analysis of historic and projected temperature data indicated that snowpack reductions over the past 30 years ranged from 8%-16% while future temperature change would result in an 11%-21% reduction in spring snowpack by 2050.

Stewart et al. (2005) evaluated the monthly fractional flow in snowmelt-dominated river systems in the Western United States and found an increasing fraction of flow occurring in March, corresponding with a decreasing fraction in June. Changes in streamflow pattern were associated with long-term increases in spring and winter temperatures, which spanned the decadal-scale Pacific climate oscillations. Barnett et al. (2008) utilized a multivariate analysis to evaluate the simultaneous changes in average winter temperature, snow pack, and runoff timing in the Western United States (including the Washington Cascades) for the period from 1950 – 1999 They found significant increasing trends in winter temperature, and decreasing trends in snow pack and runoff timing (indicating earlier snowmelt) associated with anthropogenic forcings.

The Climate Impacts Group utilized results from 20 global climate models and two emissions scenarios from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (A1B and B1) to evaluate projected changes in spring snowpack and runoff (Elsner et al. 2009). For the rivers in the Puget Sound basin they projected a dramatic decrease in spring snowpack with almost no April 1 snowpack by 2080. The climate change-related alterations in spring snowpack and streamflow timing are expected to result in lower summer flows.

Land use alterations can also result in lower summer flows. Urbanization and development are associated with an increase in impervious surface resulting in higher runoff fractions and lower infiltration (Burges et al. 1998). Reduced infiltration can lead to lower base flows, although this effect can be somewhat offset by a reduction in evapo-transpiration from the clearing of trees (Cuo et al. 2008). The construction of storm drain systems has been implicated as a primary factor in the reduction a base flows (Simmons and Reynolds 1982).

Cuo et al. (2009) utilized a Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model in order to determine the relative effects of land cover and temperature change on flow patterns in Puget Sound streams. They found that the relative importance of temperature and land cover differed between the upland and lowland basins. In the lowland basins land cover changes were more important and generally resulted in higher peak flows and lower summer flows, primarily due to increased runoff. Both land use change and climate effects were important in the upland basins. Climate change had the largest impact in the transitional zones and resulted in higher winter flows, earlier spring peak flows, and lower summer flows. A similar modeling study of a basin located in the Portland, OR metropolitan area, using a single climate change simulation combined with a ArcView Soil and Water Assessment Tool, predicted an increase in overall flow, but a decrease in summer baseflow, by 2040 (Franczyk and Chang 2009).

Monitoring trends and predicting potential future alterations in streamflow patterns is important for water resource managers to ensure sufficient supply to meet demand (Snover et al. 2003, Milly et al. 2008). In the Pacific Northwest, summer low flows define the crucial period of water use and availability, and define system yield capacity. Wiley and Palmer utilized a three-stage modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of climate change on the water supply system for Seattle metropolitan region (Wiley and Palmer 2008). They predicted a decline of 6% per decade in July-September reservoir inflows resulting in a loss of available water in the system of approximately 56,000 acre-feet by 2040. Climate-related changes may reduce overall system yield.

Vano et al. (2009) expanded the analysis to include the Everett and Tacoma water supply systems. They predicted decreased summer reservoir inflows and storage for all three systems. System reliability, however, remained relatively strong assuming current demand.

Summer low flows in streams and rivers may be ecologically important. A substantial body of literature describes the potential deleterious impacts of low summer flows on fish survival (see Crozier et al. 2008, Palmer et al. 2009 and references therein). Potential negative biological impacts of low summer flows include high water temperatures, stranding, low dissolved oxygen, crowding, and disease. Although the strength of salmon runs has been shown to be positively and significantly correlated to summer stream flow in Puget Sound rivers, the actual causative mechanism is unclear due to complicated and interrelated variations between flow, temperature, habitat, and other variables (Mathews and Olson 1980). Rand et al. (2006) evaluated the potential effects of reduced flow and increased water temperature on upriver migration of Pacific salmon in the Frasier River. Lower discharge volumes during the migration period increased survival by decreasing energy requirements of the migrating salmon (making it easier to swim upstream) leading to a stronger pre-spawn population. Higher water temperatures, however, have been shown to increase metabolic rates and increase energy requirements. Presumably, within some range, the energetic benefits of decreased flow will compensate for costs from higher temperatures, yielding no net effect.

Scheuerell et al. (2006) used summer stream temperatures, which are predicted to increase with decreased flow, as a negative factor in survival of Chinook salmon in an effort to model salmon survival according to changes in various environmental conditions. Battin et al. (2007) predicted that Chinook salmon spawner capacity was proportional to minimum discharge during the spawning period; reductions in flow would result in reductions in spawning capacity due to habitat limitations. Low flows are also important for juvenile Coho due to space and food limitations, while low flows may be associated with temperature limitations in other areas (Ebersole et al. 2009). Trout survival and growth have been shown to be negatively associated with low stream discharge (Harvey et al. 2006, Berger and Gresswell 2009).

There remains substantial uncertainty in the predicted changes, related not only to climate change, but also to biological response and potential for adaptation among various species, particularly salmonids (Crozier et al. 2008, Schindler et al. 2008). Biological responses are likely to vary according to the specific stream and basin.

Status and trends

Summer 7-day average low flow is the metric chosen to represent low stream flow conditions. It is widely used and not susceptible to temporary upstream flow changes than may affect one-day low flow calculations (Riggs 1985). Annual values for 7-day average low flow were calculated using gauge data from 14 different locations on unregulated rivers within the Puget Sound, in order to evaluate the status and trends of low flows within the region (Table 1). Data from seven rivers indicated a significantly decreasing trend in 7-day average low flow for the time period on record (p<0.05). Data from three other rivers indicated decreasing trends in 7-day average low flow, although with a slightly higher degree of statistical uncertainty (p<0.10). Four rivers showed no significant trends in annual 7-day average low flow. Notably, no river system showed significantly increasing trends in annual 7-day average low flow. The average change for the rivers with significant trends in annual 7-day average low flow was -4.4% per decade.

Table 1. Average 7-day Low Flow for the time period of record, the annual rate of change of 7-day low flow, and the probability that the trend is significantly different than zero for selected unregulated rivers and streams in the Puget Sound basin.

 

 

 

 7-DAY AVERAGE LOW FLOW

River

Data Years

 

Average Low Flow

(CFS)

Annual Change

(∆CFS/Year)

p

(change≠0)

WRIA 1 – Nooksack

 

 

 

 

 

Nooksack

USGS 12213100

1966-2009

 

1020

-6.3±3.6

0.09

WRIA 3/4 – Upper-Lower Skagit and Samish

 

 

 

 

 

Lower Sauk

USGS 12189500

1936-2009

 

1281

-3.5±2.0

0.08

Upper Sauk

USGS 12186000

1929-2009

 

231

-0.6±0.4

0.09

Thunder

USGS 12175500

1931-2009

 

225

-0.2±0.4

0.55

Newhalem

USGS 12178100

1962-2009

 

45

-0.3±0.1

0.03

Samish

USGS 12201500

1945-1970 1996-2009

 

27

0.01±0.04

0.77

WRIA 5 - Stillaguamish

 

 

 

 

 

Stillaguamish

USGS 12167000

1929-2009

 

255

-0.6±0.4

0.18

WRIA 7 –

Snohomish

 

 

 

 

 

Skykomish

USGS 12134500

1929-2009

 

655

-2.2±1.1

0.05

WRIA 8 – Cedar/Sammamish

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar

USGS 12114500

1947-2009

 

22

-0.1±0.04

0.002

WRIA 10 – Puyallup/White

 

 

 

 

 

Puyallup

USGS 12092000

1957-2009

 

216

-1.2±0.5

0.03

WRIA 11 - Nisqually

 

 

 

 

 

Nisqually

USGS 12082500

1942-2009

 

263

-0.7±0.5

0.14

WRIA 13 - Deschutes

 

 

 

 

 

Lower Deschutes

USGS 12080010

1946-1963 1990-2009

 

83

-0.4±0.1

0.001

Upper Deschutes

USGS 12079000

1950-2009

 

29

-0.1±0.04

0.0002

WRIA 16 – Skokomish/Dosewalips

 

 

 

 

 

Duckabush

USGS 12054000

1939-2009

 

72

-0.3±0.1

0.04

There were no consistently strong correlations between the annual 7-day average low flow values for the rivers within WRIA 3/4 (Table 2). Calculated annual 7-day average low flow values from Thunder Creek and the Samish River generally correlate weakly with the other rivers within the group used for comparison. Thunder Creek can be classified as a snowmelt-dominated river. The Samish River is a rainfall-dominated river. The other rivers within the group are all transition rivers. It is possible that the different hydrologic regimes partially explain the lack of correlations in low flow.

Table 2. Pearson's correlation coefficient for annual 7-day average low flow for rivers within WRIA 3/4.

 

Lower Sauk

Upper Sauk

Thunder

Cascade

Newhalem

Samish

Lower Sauk

 

0.84

0.54

0.91

0.73

0.34

Upper Sauk

 

 

0.44

0.77

0.80

0.49

Thunder

 

 

 

0.72

0.42

-0.11a

Cascade

 

 

 

 

0.80

0.23a

Newhalem

 

 

 

 

 

0.54

Notes: a. Pearson’s r not significantly different than 0 (P>0.05)

Uncertainties

The analysis presented above was derived from data in the public domain. The values and trends for 7-day average low flow were calculated from average daily discharge data from fourteen USGS station located in the Puget Sound region (United States Geological Survey 2010b). The datasets include qualification codes indicating whether data are provisional or have been approved (United States Geological Survey 2010a). We avoided using provisional data in this analysis, and we omitted data from gauging stations for which advisory notes warning against unreliable data quality had been posted.

The 7-day low flow values were calculated for the period from June 1 – November 1; this time period was chosen to avoid the potential capture of winter low flows in the snowmelt-dominated river system (e.g., Thunder Creek). Trends were determined by calculating the slope of the annual 7-day low flow versus year using simple linear regression. Significance was determined by applying the Student’s t-test to determine the probability of the slope being significantly different than zero (P<0.05).

The significance of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined by estimating the probability that the correlation was different than zero based on the value of the correlation and the sample size. A significant correlation does not indicate a strong correlation.

Summary

Analysis of streamflow data revealed decreasing trends in 7-day average low flow values for seven of 14 guaging stations. Among the remaining stations, none showed significant increasing trends. Substantial inter-annual variation in low flow was evident. Annual 7-day average low flows among the river systems in WRIA 3/4 showed no consistent correlation. The weakest correlations were between the snowmelt-dominated (Thunder Creek), the rainfall-dominated (Samish River) and the remaining river systems. Seven-day average low flow could be a useful indicator of changing conditions in these watersheds.

References

Barnett, T. P., D. W. Pierce, H. G. Hidalgo, C. Bonfils, B. D. Santer, T. Das, G. Bala, A. W. Wood, T. Nozawa, A. A. Mirin, D. R. Cayan, and M. D. Dettinger. 2008. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319:1080-1083.

Battin, J., M. W. Wiley, M. H. Ruckelshaus, R. N. Palmer, E. Korb, K. K. Bartz, and H. Imaki. 2007. Projected impacts of climate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:6720-6725.

Berger, A. M., and R. E. Gresswell. 2009. Factors influencing coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) seasonal survival rates: a spatially continuous approach within stream networks. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:613-632.

Burges, S. J., M. S. Wigmosta, and J. M. Meena. 1998. Hydrological Effects of Land-Use Change in a Zero-Order Catchment. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 3:86-97.

Casola, J. H., L. Cuo, B. Livneh, D. P. Lettenmaier, M. T. Stoelinga, P. W. Mote, and J. M. Wallace. 2009. Assessing the impacts of global warming on snowpack in the Washington Cascades. Journal of Climate 22:2758-2772.

Crozier, L. G., A. P. Hendry, P. W. Lawson, T. P. Quinn, N. J. Mantua, J. Battin, R. G. Shaw, and R. B. Huey. 2008. Potential responses to climate change in organisms with complex life histories: evolution and plasticity in Pacific salmon. Evolutionary Applications 1:252-270.

Cuo, L., D. P. Lettenmaier, M. Alberti, and J. E. Richey. 2009. Effects of a century of land cover and climate change on the hydrology of the Puget Sound basin. Hydrological Processes 23:907-933.

Cuo, L., D. P. Lettenmaier, B. V. Mattheussen, P. Storck, and M. Wiley. 2008. Hydrologic prediction for urban watersheds with the Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model. Hydrological Processes 22:4205-4213.

Ebersole, J. L., M. E. Colvin, P. J. Wigington, S. G. Leibowitz, J. P. Baker, M. R. Church, J. E. Compton, and M. A. Cairns. 2009. Hierarchical Modeling of Late-Summer Weight and Summer Abundance of Juvenile Coho Salmon across a Stream Network. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:1138-1156.

Elsner, M. M., L. Cuo, N. Voisin, J. S. Deems, A. F. Hamlet, J. A. Vano, K. E. Mickelson, S.-Y. Lee, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2009. Implications of 21st Century Climate Change for the Hydrology of Washington State. JISAO Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Franczyk, J., and H. Chang. 2009. The effects of climate change and urbanization on the runoff of the Rock Creek basin in the Portland metropolitan area, Oregon, USA. Hydrological Processes 23:805-815.

Hamlet, A. F., P. W. Mote, M. P. Clark, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2005. Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the western United States. Journal of Climate 18:4545-4561.

Harvey, B. C., R. J. Nakamoto, and J. L. White. 2006. Reduced streamflow lowers dry-season growth of rainbow trout in a small stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:998-1005.

Mathews, S. B., and F. W. Olson. 1980. Factors affecting Puget Sound coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) runs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:1373-1378.

Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. Climate change - Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319:573-574.

Mote, P., D. Canning, D. Fluharty, R. Francis, J. Franklin, A. Hamlet, M. Hershman, M. Holmberg, K. G. Ideker, W. Keeton, D. Lettenmaier, R. Leung, N. Mantua, E. Miles, B. Noble, H. Parandvash, D. W. Peterson, A. Snover, and S. Willard. 1999. Impacts of climate variability and change inthe Pacific Northwest. The JISAO Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Mote, P. W. 2003. Trends in snow water equivalent in the Pacific Northwest and their climatic causes. Geophysical Research Letters 30.

Mote, P. W. 2006. Climate-driven variability and trends in mountain snowpack in western North America. Journal of Climate 19:6209-6220.

Mote, P. W., A. F. Hamlet, M. P. Clark, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2005. Declining mountain snowpack in western north America. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 86:39-+.

Mote, P. W., E. Parson, A. F. Hamlet, W. S. Keeton, D. Lettenmaier, N. Mantua, E. L. Miles, D. Peterson, D. L. Peterson, R. Slaughter, and A. K. Snover. 2003. Preparing for climatic change: The water, salmon, and forests of the Pacific Northwest. Climatic Change 61:45-88.

Palmer, M. A., D. P. Lettenmaier, N. L. Poff, S. L. Postel, B. Richter, and R. Warner. 2009. Climate Change and River Ecosystems: Protection and Adaptation Options. Environmental Management 44:1053-1068.

Rand, P. S., S. G. Hinch, J. Morrison, M. G. G. Foreman, M. J. MacNutt, J. S. Macdonald, M. C. Healey, A. P. Farrell, and D. A. Higgs. 2006. Effects of river discharge, temperature, and future climates on energetics and mortality of adult migrating Fraser River sockeye salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:655-667.

Riggs, H. C. 1985. Streamflow characteristics. Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York.

Scheuerell, M. D., R. Hilborn, M. H. Ruckelshaus, K. K. Bartz, K. M. Lagueux, A. D. Haas, and K. Rawson. 2006. The Shiraz model: a tool for incorporating anthropogenic effects and fish-habitat relationships in conservation planning. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:1596-1607.

Schindler, D. E., X. Augerot, E. Fleishman, N. J. Mantua, B. Riddell, M. Ruckelshaus, J. Seeb, and M. Webster. 2008. Climate Change, Ecosystem Impacts, and Management for Pacific Salmon. Fisheries 33:502-506.

Simmons, D. L., and R. J. Reynolds. 1982. Effects of urganization on base-flow of selected South-shore streams, Long Island, New York.Water Resources Bulletin 18:797-805.

Snover, A. K., A. F. Hamlet, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2003. Climate-change scenarios for water planning studies - Pilot applications in the Pacific Northwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 84:1513-1518.

Stewart, I. T., D. R. Cayan, and M. D. Dettinger. 2005. Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. Journal of Climate 18:1136-1155.

United States Geological Survey. 2010a. Provisional data for Washington.

United States Geological Survey. 2010b. USGS Washington Water Science Center.

Vano, J. A., N. Voisin, L. Cuo, A. F. Hamlet, M. M. Elsner, R. N. Palmer, A. Polebitski, and D. P. Lettenmaier. 2009. Climate Change Impacts on Water Management in the Puget Sound Region, Washington, USA. JISAO Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Wiley, M. W., and R. N. Palmer. 2008. Estimating the impacts and uncertainty of climate change on a municipal water supply system. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-Asce 134:239-246.